ATHLETE CARDING APPLICATION | EVALUATION/POWER RANKINGS | Appendix 3

  

Fill out: Athlete Info-Carding Criteria-Coach Info-Evaluation. Athletes and Coaches are encouraged to initially score themselves for the application. Add any additional information as need to support your application.

  

ATHLETE INFO

   Evaluation Date:
Name
Surname
Email
Age / DOB
Mobile
Year of Carding

CARDING CRITERIA

    
Achieved the Performance Standard for your carding level?
Meet the eligibility conditions (clause 3.2)
 
Performance
Event
 

COACH INFO

    
Coach
Email
Mobile

EVALUATION

    
FACTORS GUIDANCE SCORE
Likelihood of making the 2012 team
Likelihood of making the 2016 team		 Based on potential to podium: (1-4) potential, (5-9) qualifier, (10) top 25, (15) top 16, (20) top 8. Score will incorporate progression of world standards in the event. 1-20
Consistency of performances High scores reflect consistent performances at or close to SB. Score is based on the 4 best performances of the season. 1-5
Performance progression Based on hard facts (SBs, placings, etc...) wherever possible, using as many years data as available. 1-5
Commitment to the program Is the athlete willing and able to commit sufficiently to the programme to ensure that our investment will result in improved performances. 1-5
Competition placing Based on place in the major competition(s) of that year. (1-5) top 30, (6) top 25, (10) top 16, (15) top 8, (20) top 3. 1-20
Profile against the worlds top competitors World Rankings List 3 per country reverse score: (25) for 1st, (24) 2nd, and so on. http://www.iaaf.org/statistics/toplists/index.html 1-25
Physical resilience Reflects the fragility or ‘injury proneness’ of the athlete. 1-5
Environment Facilities, training group, support for training, overall training environment. 1-5
Coaching quality Based on observation, quality of coach’s planning/peaking and technical input, and commitment to this athlete. 1-5
Coaching development Reflects the coach’s willingness and commitment to personal development, especially as pertaining to increasing their capacity to improve this athlete. 1-5
Performance score Performance Score (to be filled out by High Performance Department)
TOTAL SCORE:
Is the athlete tracking “UP” and/or maintaining their performance:

 
Did the athlete qualify and compete at an age related world championship:

 
Did the athlete show peak performance at a targeted championship event based on place and/or % of seasons best compared to their championship results:
 
Was there an injury that effected performance:

  


Powered By ChronoForms - ChronoEngine.com